As predicted in a previous post, another employer has attempted to expand the recent Supreme Court decision upholding arbitration agreements to quash a potential class action sexual harassment case.

On Tuesday, O’Melveny & Myers, LLP argued before a California federal court that the recent AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion decision compels arbitration in a putative

On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a much anticipated decision (pdf), ruling that an employer may review communications sent by an employee on a company issued device.

In 2002, the City of Ontario, California issued pagers capable of sending and receiving text messages to members of its SWAT team.

Title VII prohibits an employer from discriminating in the terms and conditions of employment “because of” a person’s gender, race, religion, nationality, etc. Similarly, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), prohibits an employer from discriminating in the terms and conditions of employment “because of” a person’s age. Since 1989, courts generally used